Yesterday, Rob Port of the SayAnythingBlog hosted a debate on his radio show featuring State Senator Tim Flakoll (R-Fargo) and North Dakota School Board Association Jon Martinson.
And the debate got quite heated with Senator Flakoll mis-characterizing testimony given during the legislative session.
Senator Flakoll repeatedly claims that property taxes will go up if this fund is not opened up to be spent - this is a scare tactic and proves that when the "property tax reform buydown" money was rolled into the Permanent Education Spending Formula it was not so permanent afterall.
During the 2013 legislative session, the money that was used for the original Property Tax Buydown was rolled into the K-12 Education Funding Formula, as Governor Dalrymple's press release stated:
Following Dalrymple’s recommendation, the Legislature approved the most significant reform in K-12 funding in state history. The Legislature approved the governor’s proposal to establish a new, integrated formula to deliver both property tax relief and strong funding for schools so that all students receive the educational resources they need to succeed.
The Legislature approved $1.7 billion to fund schools and reduce the local cost for school funding. The appropriation represents an increase of $477 million compared to 2011-2013 funding. The new funding formula is sustainable and will result in most school districts needing to levy no more than about 70 mills to cover the local share of school funding. For the average school district, this represents about a 45 percent reduction in local property tax rates.
The Legislature also approved the governor’s recommendation to provide grants to school districts challenged by rapidly growing enrollments. The Legislature provided $13.6 million for school districts that experienced enrollment growth of four percent or more during the previous year. Additionally, the Legislature approved the governor’s proposal to increase school transportation funding by more than 10 percent, from $48.5 million to $53.5 million, to help districts meet the rising costs of providing student transportation services.
Now, all of a sudden, when the budget has gone beyond what revenue can support, the Chairman of the Senate Education Committee says that if the legislature can't raid the Foundation Aid Stabilization Fund your property taxes will go up.
So was Governor Dalrymple misleading the public when he said "The new funding formula is sustainable and will result in most school districts needing to levy no more than about 70 mills to cover the local share of school funding."
Or is Senator Flakoll simply manufacturing a scare tactic to promote the Teacher's Union agenda?
Why is it every time politicians spend too much money they end up threatening taxpayers?
The debate is about 36 minutes long, and for those who want to get a good handle on this issue, it is worth a listen.
There will be plenty more on this issue.