MMI Banner
 

December, 2020

Brain abscess

Click image for a 7 min video tutorial

How does a healthy 24 yo get a brain abscess?

How does a doctor miss it? Is it negligence?

Facts: A 24 yo male is taken to the ED by his parents after “passing out” and “unconscious for a few seconds." He has been ill for 3 days with abdominal px, fever, diarrhea and vomiting. His father had just helped him out of bed when his limbs began “shaking.” His father believes his son is dehydrated. The triage nurse records the event as a “seizure” lasting 7 minutes (documented on his later return to the ED as “10 minutes of blank stare.") ROS reveals back px, myalgias and weakness but no HA or ear px. No PH of substance abuse. VS are normal with a T of 97.3 (1 hour after ibuprofen.) Exam 30 minutes after the event records him as being “A & O” but “tired appearing” and “not appearing post-ictal.” He has “severe eczema especially on the hands and arms.” Speech, behavior and remainder of exam is normal and GCS is 15. WBC is 22,910 with 82% polys and 8% bands with 2+ toxic granulation and 1+ Dohle bodies. Urine specific gravity is 1.02 w/ ketones. UDS is negative. A CT abdomen w/ IV contrast is normal. The record mentions an ongoing community outbreak of gastroenteritis with "6 patients currently in the ED with similar sx." He is given Zofran for nausea, Norflex, Toradol 15 mg and MS 2 mg for back px, plus 3 L of IV NS. He is able to walk independently to the BR before being discharged "improved" w/ a dx of gastroenteritis. Sixteen hours later he has a grand mal seizure and returns to the ED via EMS, comatose with a GCS of 3. A second EP elicits a hx of recurrent ear infections, 5 sets of PE tubes and some recent drainage from the L ear, confirmed on exam as a "brown drainage." A CT scan shows a L temporal mass, cerebral edema and possible early herniation. He is transferred to a tertiary care hospital where an MRI reveals bilateral mastoiditis with bony erosion. He undergoes surgery but dies post-op due to brain herniation.
Plaintiff: You paid no attention to the high WBC w/ a left shift. You minimized the seizure. You never asked about his ears and didn’t examine them. Fever and a seizure in a healthy 24 yo warrants a CT scan of the brain.
Defense: The ED doc considered the evidence for a seizure (“not post-ictal”) and reasoned that dehydration and orthostatic hypotension explained a syncopal episode with limb shaking. A thorough differential dx and the high WBC was addressed in the MDM. Not imaging the brain was a reasonable judgment call based on the lack of headache or other neurological signs or symptoms. The elevated WBC could be due to dehydration. There is no negligence, as the documentation supports reasonable judgment calls.
Result: An attorney is consulted and the records were reviewed by an emergency medicine expert. The expert identified Issues that would likely be raised by the defense and their experts, e.g., “judgment vs. negligence” and "causation," i.e., the likelihood of a better outcome with earlier surgery. A battle of multiple experts (EM, ENT, neurosurgery, infectious disease, nursing) over several years at unpredictable expense was inevitable, making the case too risky for the attorney's firm to pursue. The family was advised that a larger firm with deeper pockets and more risk tolerance might consider pursuing the case.
Takeaways:
* Read the nursing notes. The word "seizure" should capture one's attention.
* Document any discrepancies between your own history/exam and that of the nurse(s). Discuss them with the nurse(s). EM is a "team sport." Include your team.
* Pay attention to lab values, especially bandemia. A CRP/ESR could have been helpful in this case.
* Acute on chronic ear infection was the likely source of the brain abscess (and mastoiditis), yet the ENT hx and exam were incomplete on the first ED visit.
* Good MDM is a defense against a malpractice lawsuit. One can make a wrong judgment that is not negligent, but one’s reasoning must be documented. In this case the words "post ictal" play a significant role, indicating the EP was aware of a possible seizure.
* Only 70% of patients with a brain abscess have a headache.
* The triad of fever, headache and focal neurologic deficit occurs in less than half of patients. This patient had none of these.
* The clinical course ranges from indolent to fulminant. Symptoms are present for 2 weeks or less in about 2/3 of patients.
Reference: Brain Abscess Clinical Presentation. Brook I. Medscape eMedicine. Updated: Oct 27, 2017.

lion-falls-into-lake

A jury doesn't need an expert to prove "ordinary negligence"

If your mistake is obvious to the average lay person, how deep are your pockets?

Facts: A nurse in a nursing home mistakenly administers 120 mg of morphine to the wrong patient (correctly ordered for a different terminal patient's pain) at 3:05 pm. She realizes her mistake and reports it to her supervisor. Narcan is given and the patient is monitored. He remains at the NH where he is last noted to be “alert and verbally responsive” at 5 pm near the end of her shift. At 11 am the next morning, the same nurse returns to work. She immediately checks her patient, finds him comatose and he is transported to the hospital where he dies 3 days later. The death certificate says “morphine intoxication.” A lawsuit is filed for "ordinary negligence" which, unlike medical malpractice, does not require expert testimony.
Plaintiff: You gave the patient a dangerous medication that was not ordered for him. You failed to monitor him appropriately or send him to the hospital. Our claim is for ordinary negligence, because any person with common sense knows this is a serious mistake. It’s not medical malpractice, so we don't need an expert to prove it.
Defense: We ask you (the District Court judge) to approve our motion for summary judgment (MSJ) because this is medical malpractice, not ordinary negligence. The plaintiff needs an expert witness to prove it. There isn't one, so the claim is void.
Result: The MSJ was granted by the District Court, but the plaintiff appealed. The Appeals Court over-ruled the District Court, saying that any lay juror would know that giving a dangerous dose of the wrong drug to the wrong patient and then failing to monitor him is simply negligent. There's no professional medical judgment involved. It's common knowledge, common experience and common sense, so no expert opinion is required. The case was remanded back to the District Court for trial. The outcome is unknown.
Takeaways:
* There can be a clear line between simple stupidity and medical malpractice.
* Expert testimony is not required for a claim of ordinary negligence.
* Your med mal insurance policy may not cover a claim of ordinary negligence. Now would be a good time to find out.
* Caps on malpractice judgments or settlements, present in many states, may not apply to a claim of ordinary negligence. In that case, your own pockets, no matter how deep, could be completely emptied.
Reference: Professional Negligence Versus Ordinary Negligence in a Medical Office. Medical Justice, Jan 8, 2018.
Source: 136 Nevada, Advance Opinion 39.

Need medical records? There's an app for that.

SyncMD: A smartphone app to securely share encrypted medical records

Every day, patients and doctors face the challenge of transferring medical records from one provider to another. A colleague of mine and co-investor is the CMO of SyncMD, the world’s first secure mobile Personal Health Record (PHR). The free SyncMD app allows the patient to obtain and share encrypted records from/to any EHR in the world via a smartphone. Epic? Cerner? Cruise ship infirmary? Anywhere. No integration needed. The app is available to hospitals and clinics and in use by many already (including a VA test site) as the default means of complying with medical record requests. Share this news with your HIM manager or medical records department.
* Here’s a 30 second introductory video.
* Here's SyncMD's corporate information.
* Contact Dr. Paul Buehrens, CMO, for more information.

Prescription for successful patient engagement:
Lead with curiosity.
Embrace uncertainty when it exists.
Reassure honestly.
Communicate effectively.

Dan Berg, Patient Advocate

Special Offer for Readers of Med Mal Insights

Check out Dr. Brady Pregerson's helpful tools for the practice of Emergency Medicine - like the Tarascon Emergency Department Quick Reference Guide. Click the banner image below for a special 25% discount on any of his books.

Screen Shot 2020-10-07 at 2.06.58 PM

Click the image for 25% off on any of Dr. Pregerson's pocket tools.

CME Credit:

MMI-LFL qualifies for Level 2 CME credit on an hour-for-hour basis.

To subscribe to MMI-LFL (FREE)

Click here to subscribe. Personal email addresses work best. It's double opt-in, so check your email to confirm your signup.

Submit cases or near misses

If you know of a case of medical malpractice (or a near miss) that has teaching points to share with other docs, please contact me. Cases are anonymized for publication.

Archives:

An Archive of past issues can be viewed here.

MMI mission:

▪ improve patient safety
▪ educate physicians
▪ reduce the cost and stress of medical malpractice lawsuits.
improve patient safety
educate physicians
reduce the cost and stress of medical malpractice lawsuits.

Charles A. Pilcher MD FACEP, Editor
Medical Malpractice Insights

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company