Dear Colleague: For this month, the NEARI Press newsletter article focuses on whether the risk assessment results are accurately reflected in the rec

   
NEARI Press Masthead with Photos

Dear Colleague:
For this month, the NEARI Press newsletter article focuses on whether the risk assessment results are accurately reflected in the recommendations and then the implementation of the recommendations for each adolescent. To us, it is almost like the game of telephone…does the last person in the chain get the same message as the first? The research found many obstacles exist to ensuring each client gets the services that are most needed. But the good news is that when the identified needs were effectively matched with services, the teens reoffended at significantly lower rates than youth whose needs were not matched.

As always, if you have any other questions or suggestions for future newsletter topics, please don't hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely, Joan Tabachnick and Steven Bengis

***

Implementing Risk Assessments for Adolescents

by Steven Bengis, David S. Prescott, and Joan Tabachnick

The Question
Even if we do a risk assessment, are we making the right recommendations and effectively implementing them?

The Research
Michele Peterson-Badali, Tracy Skilling, and Zohrah Haqanee collected data from 148 youth who completed a court-ordered forensic assessment for a violent (non-sexual) offense, a non-violent offense, or a sexual offense. Through this research, they explored the steps in the process from risk assessment through case management:
1. A risk-needs assessment (identifying specific factors or criminogenic needs that must be addressed to reduce risk);
2. The recommendations based upon these identified treatment and supervision needs (correlation of the assessment to the recommendations); and
3. The implementation of a case management plan and treatment that would “match” (e.g., properly address) these identified factors.

The researchers aptly point out that when creating and implementing a case management plan, it is vital that the clinician consult both the literature about general risk prediction as well as the individual clients such as cognitive ability, learning style and motivation that may affect the effectiveness of any particular intervention. Unfortunately, the study also found that programs set up to address these treatment needs can often be in short supply.

For step one, the researchers suggest the importance of dynamic risk scores from a programming perspective, because they are the factors amenable to change and are the necessary targets for treatment recommendations. The study results show that criminogenic needs (dynamic risk factors) contribute to prediction of re-offense, over and above criminal history, which then suggests that providers target these needs in case management.

For step two, they found that it was not possible to conclude that the criminogenic needs and the corresponding recommendations were driven by the client’s domain scores. Decisions about recommendations seemed to reflect a variety of considerations including whether or not services were available for that client.

For step three, the study explored whether the needs identified in the assessments are actually addressed during probation. There was a wide range of the “match” between identified needs and services provided ranging from 93% (education and employment) to a low of 15% (antisocial attitudes). This huge gap in “theory to practice” seems to demand closer examination and action to ensure that the client’s needs are in fact, appropriately matched with services – especially in light of the evidence that this matching is associated with decreased recidivism.

Bottom Line: Participants with identified needs that were matched with services reoffended at significantly lower rates than youth whose needs were not matched.

Implications for Professionals
As our profession gets ever more skilled in providing individualized comprehensive, developmentally, contextually sensitive and evidence-based risk assessments, this research suggest that we need to be more vigilant about linking our recommendations to the risk, needs, and responsivity of our clients, regardless of the availability of services. Modifying recommendations to conform to the absence of known services both fails our clients and we lose the opportunity to increase our pressure to reform inadequate systems for all of our clients. To ensure that the recommendations are implemented, we also need to build stronger relationships with case managers and probation officers; engaging them in understanding the importance of individualized approaches and also join together in both our implementation and advocacy efforts.

Implications for the Field
As the risk assessment field continues to reflect the emerging research, the community may not be able to match the needed resources to these more sophisticated recommendations. Given that reality, our public policy efforts needs to ensure that the nuance required for successful treatment becomes part of the service-delivery system. Sexual safety is a compelling message supported by a growing number of survivor organizations as well as professionals working with children and adolescents who have sexually abused. Working together, we can help ensure that both victims and youth who have caused the harm are given high-quality, evidence-based treatment and adequate case management support.

Abstract
Research on implementation of a case management plan informed by valid risk assessment in justice services is important in contributing to evidence-based practice but has been neglected in youth justice. We examined the connections between risk assessment, treatment, and recidivism by focusing on the individual criminogenic needs domain level. Controlling for static risk, dynamic criminogenic needs significantly predicted reoffense. Meeting individual needs in treatment was associated with decreased offending. However, there is “slippage” in the system that reduces practitioners’ ability to effectively address needs. Even in domains where interventions are available, many youth are not receiving services matched to their needs. Implications and limitations of findings are discussed.

Citation
Peterson-Badali, M, Skilling, T & Haqanee, Z. (2015). Examining implementation of risk assessment in case management for youth in the justice system. Criminal Justice and Behavior. Vol 42, No 3. 304-320.

To print a pdf of this article, click NEARI NEWS.

***

BECOME A WEBINAR SERIES SPONSOR

Neari 2014 Catalog thumb

NEW 2014-2015 Catalog

Please consider becoming a sponsor of NEARIPress.org's exciting new 2015-2016 NEARI Press Webinar series. We will continue to feature nationally recognized authors including, but not limited to: Cordelia Anderson, Jill Stinson, Phil Rich, Janet Rosensweig, and David Prescott among many others.

For $98 as an individual or $250 as an organization, we will guarantee your seat in the webinar AND offer you CE credits. We do all of the work to sign you up each month, and, as a thank you for your essential support, we offer you two free NEARI Press books - Current Perspectives and Current Applications, both edited by David Prescott and Robert Longo. We think that this is really a win-win situation for all of us.

For more information or to sign up, visit our website at info@nearipress.org or contact Diane Langelier at 413.540.0712 x14 or email her at info@nearipress.org.

***

FEATURED NEARI RESOURCES

Current-Perspectives Applications-Neurobiology Book

Current Perspectives & Applications in Neurobiology: Working with Young Persons who are Victims and Perpetrators of Sexual Abuse

Edited by Robert E. Longo, David S. Prescott, John Bergman, and Kevin Creeden

One of the most important scientific advancements of the past few decades is our increased understanding of the brain and the impact of our environment on this complex neurobiology. This new volume by some of the leading experts in the field compiles a comprehensive overview of the core issues we need to understand affecting the neurobiology, neuroscience and the assessment and treatment of sexually abusive youth as well as the child and adolescent victims of sexually abusive and aggressive behavior.

ISBN: 978-1-929657-67-4
Cost: $69 plus shipping and handling

Upcoming Training with Dr. Phil Rich: Assessment of Juvenile Sexual Risk: 3-Day Certification

Presented by: Phil Rich, Ed.D, LICSW
Date: June 2-4, 2015
Location: Marlboro, Massachusetts

This three-day course will provide instruction and practice experience in administration of sexual risk assessment for juveniles who have previously engaged in sexually abusive behavior. The course will cover the process of risk assessment, from theory, method, and instrumentation to case study and applied practice, including case formulation.

CE credits: 3 days of CE credits are available for Social Workers and Psychologists through a competency-based process.

For a downloadable flyer, click here.

For more information or to sign up, please contact Diane Langelier at 413.540.0712 x14 or at info@nearipress.org.

***

DONATE NOW TO NEARI PRESS

NEARI Press is a nonprofit and depends upon the support of professionals like you to continue our work. Please consider giving a donation to NEARI Press.

Click here to make a donation of any amount. Thank you!

***

QUESTIONS/FEEDBACK

Please email us at info@nearipress.org or call us at 413.540.0712, x14 to let us know if you have a question or a topic you would like us to cover.

If at any time you no longer want the e-newsletter, just let us know and we will remove your name from our list. We value your trust. We will not sell or give your contact information to any other organization.

Volume 8, Issue 4: April 2015

1px