■ Director’s Corner ■ Recent Evaluations ■ The Evaluator's Perspective ■ Events and Presentations Dear Colleagues, It is a pleasure to share with yo

Newsletter-August-2016-Banner-Thin white behind2
Directors-corner new
Juha-August 2016

Dear Colleagues,

It is a pleasure to share with you the August issue of the newsletter of the Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) of the Global Environment Facility (GEF). During the last few months, we consulted with many stakeholders on the approach to the Sixth Comprehensive Evaluation of the GEF (OPS6) that will inform the next replenishment negotiations of the GEF. This evaluation and its various sub-studies will occupy the office for the several coming months. The consultations identified important areas to be addressed in the evaluation including the role of the GEF in the changing landscape for environmental finance, the new focus on programmatic and integrated approaches by the GEF and the overall health of the GEF partnership. The findings of this evaluation will be ready by June 2017. The IEO will have a very busy year completing this evaluation, and we will continue to request inputs from many of you into this important exercise.

This newsletter presents the findings of our recently completed evaluations, and recent external engagements where we share the insights from our work including investments in new methodologies. Our new website is now ready and has been created to provide you not only with information about our evaluations but also to draw your attention to the data and the methodologies being used in them. We are testing out new approaches and methodologies in our ongoing evaluations such as rapid impact evaluation, as well as applying geospatial analysis more broadly. We have created new search capabilities for easy access to our reports, as well as a collaborative space to better engage with stakeholders. As is the case with all websites, this is ongoing work in progress and I would appreciate any feedback that will allow us to continue optimizing and improving its capabilities to serve you better.

To illustrate some of the work we have done since 2003 and to provide you with an overview of the ongoing Sixth Comprehensive Evaluation, here is a three-minute video.

Enjoy the rest of the summer! We will be back in touch towards the end of the year.

Recent Evaluaitons
GEF CSO new

Has the GEF Civil Society Network effectively fulfilled its role?

The GEF - Civil Society Organizations (CSO) Network was established in May 1995 to organize a formal dialogue and partnership between CSOs worldwide and the GEF. This evaluation found that the Network made contributions to important policies, such as the GEF Public Involvement Policy, and overall support to indigenous peoples. More broadly, the evaluation highlighted the need for strengthened governance and a shared vision that fosters utility and added value.

Read more

***
LDCF

How relevant has the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) been in supporting adaptation to climate change?

The GEF acts as an operating entity for the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF). The Fund was established in 2001 and provides support to climate change adaptation efforts of the least developed countries. The evaluation concluded that Fund-supported activities, for the most part, have been highly relevant to guidance of the Conference of Parties (COP) of the United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); and to the countries’ development priorities. However, the unpredictable funding creates uncertainty for the implementation of the countries’ main climate change adaptation priorities.

Read more

***
Morocco-Taji

Has the GEF had a positive effect in Morocco and Tajikistan?

Recently completed Morocco and Tajikistan Country Portfolio Evaluations focused on multiple benefits of the GEF support to partner countries. In Tajikistan, the evaluation concluded that GEF support was effective in protected areas management and biosafety legislation, while support to Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) was limited. In Morocco, the GEF contributed to an enabling environment for solar energy, conservation of protected areas, prevention of deforestation, and elimination of dangerous chemicals. However, gender issues were not systematically taken into account in the country portfolio.

Tajikistan Country Portfolio Evaluation | Morocco Country Portfolio Evaluation

***
Performance Evaluations

Is the GEF’s performance on track? Evidence from Performance Evaluations

IEO prepared two annual reports on the performance of GEF operations. The Annual Performance Report (APR) 2015 analyzed the performance of GEF activities and processes, key factors affecting performance, monitoring and evaluation, as well as an in-depth assessment of the GEF tracking tools. Seventy-five percent of the GEF projects had moderately satisfactory or higher outcome ratings, slightly lower than the average of 81 percent reported in previous years. This was partly explained by a higher representation of projects from the Africa region, which tend to have lower outcome ratings. In addition, projects implemented in Small Island Developing States had, on average, lower outcome ratings than other projects.

The Annual Evaluation Report (AER) 2015 provided a detailed performance overview of the completed projects supported by the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) and Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF). The experience with the funds is still quite limited. Ten of the only eleven completed projects, reported this year, had outcome ratings in the satisfactory range. Eight of the eleven completed projects received sustainability ratings in the likely range, suggesting limited risks to the sustainability of the projects’ outcomes.

Download APR 2015 | Download AER 2015

Evaluators Perspective
Environment-Porverty

The article by Juha Uitto in the Global Policy in 2016 outlined the approaches to evaluate the nexus between environment and poverty in international development where issues of environmental conservation and management meet the social and economic development needs. Based on a review of evaluation literature and practical evaluation experience, the article draws lessons for evaluating sustainable development and suggests implications for evaluating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Download article

***
GEF SGD

Geeta Batra prepared a paper on evaluation approaches adopted by the IEO to measure the impacts of GEF interventions in focal areas that are related to SDGs, which include the measurement of environmental benefits across focal areas and broad socio-economic co-benefits. Some of these approaches include mixed methods and complexity theory, incorporating assessments of quality assurance and safeguard mechanisms, mainstreaming methodologies for evaluating partnerships, private sector and civil society engagement, and establishing partnerships in evaluation. The paper was presented at the Evaluation Practice Exchange organized by the United Nations Evaluation Group in April 2016 in Geneva, Switzerland.

Download paper

Events and Presentations
remote sensing new

IEO’s testing of New Technologies for M&E

IEO shared its experience in the use of new technologies and big data in evaluation on several international platforms. On April 26 Juha Uitto took part in the 19th Meeting of the DAC Network on Development Evaluation in Paris, France. His speech depicted opportunities to use big data in the context of SDGs and presented the IEO experience in remote sensing, propensity score matching, and planetary level cloud computing in recent impact evaluations. Later on June 28, Juha gave another invited seminar on a related topic at the Development Evaluation Division of Global Affairs Canada in Ottawa. On the same day 28, Anupam Anand presented on the topic of the Big Data Revolution for Sustainable Development at the XIth Meeting of the Latin America and the Caribbean Monitoring and Evaluation Network (REDLACME) in Santiago de Chile.

Download presentation

***
CBD Protected Areas new

GEF’s Protected Areas Impact Evaluation presented to the Convention on Biological Diversity

On May 2nd Juha Uitto participated in the First Meetings of the Subsidiary Body on Implementation (SBI) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in Montreal, Canada. This high level event created an excellent opportunity to discuss the findings of the IEO Impact Evaluation of the GEF Support to Protected Areas and Protected Ares Systems. .

Download Presentation | More about IEO Biodiversity Impact Evaluation

***
Adaptation Futures

Adaptation Futures

IEO organized two panel sessions at the Adaptation Futures 2016 conference, which took place on May 10-13, in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. One of the sessions, chaired by Anna Viggh (IEO) focused on measuring resilience. The objective of the session was to share, get feedback and stimulate discussion on the latest resilience measurement thinking, and how this might shape the program logic of future adaptation relevant interventions, and related M&E endeavors.

Read blog about IEO sessions

***
Climate Change Policy

Mexico: Implementing Climate Change Policy Evaluation

On May 25, Juha Uitto was the keynote speaker at the Forum on Implementing Climate Change Policy Evaluation convened by the National Institute of Ecology and Climate Change in Mexico. In his speech, Juha outlined progress and challenges in evaluation of environmental and climate change policies. He emphasized the need to address climate change from a holistic perspective focusing on the effectiveness of policy implementation and using rigorous evaluation methodologies, and solid theories of change.

Read Key Note Address | Forum Press Release

***
IPDET

IEO's initiatives in Building Capacity: Training at IPDET

On June 29 – July 1, Juha Uitto (IEO) and Rob D. van den Berg (IDEAS and King’s College London) facilitated a workshop on challenges in evaluating the sustainability of development at the International Program on Development Evaluation Training (IPDET) at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. The workshop participants discussed how difficulties of scope, scale and timing, and linkages between climate change, natural resources management, poverty, gender and development, could and should be tackled in evaluations. In addition, during the IPDET core course, Jeneen Garcia (IEO) gave a guest lecture on the IEO experience in addressing different types of complexity in evaluations.

Read more about the workshop | Download Presentation on Complexity and the Art of Possible

flickr twitter youtube ieo_email issuu web_site
1px